Skip to content
All questionsREADING PATH 02 / 07

The Islamic dilemma

The Qur’an appeals to the Torah and Gospel in its hearers’ hands. A lost alternative must be demonstrated, not assumed.

THE QUESTION BEFORE US

Which Gospel could they actually read and obey?

Choose a verse number, book icon or underlined word to read more here.

01 Scripture in their hands

Bring it. Read it. Judge by it.

In Qur’an , Muhammad is told to challenge his hearers to bring the Torah and recite it in a dispute about food. In , the Qur’an asks why Jewish interlocutors seek his judgment when the Torah is with them and contains God’s judgment. Those appeals require an accessible book. A revelation that had disappeared could not be brought, read aloud, or consulted in a real dispute.

Qur’an 3:93 Qur’an 5:43

The Gospel receives a similar appeal. Qur’an describes it as guidance and light; calls the People of the Gospel to judge by what God revealed in it. Verse says they would have been blessed had they upheld the Torah and Gospel; tells them they stand on nothing until they uphold them. And says the unlettered messenger is found described in the Torah and Gospel with them. A food-law dispute does not endorse every biblical sentence. These passages do, however, address existing communities as possessors of usable divine revelation.

Qur’an 5:46 Qur’an 5:47 Qur’an 5:66 Qur’an 5:68 Qur’an 7:157

Qur’an addresses Muhammad himself: if he doubts what has been revealed to him, he should ask those who read the earlier Scripture. The condition does not establish that he actually doubted. Even if he never did, the instruction still makes those readers a source of confirmation. Ibn Kathir connects this appeal with the Torah and Gospel in the hands of the People of the Book, while accusing them, in the same comment, of obscuring, distorting and altering what those books say about Muhammad. Even on his account, the witness being consulted is available, not an imagined lost original. A claim that their Scriptures were unreliable must account for the Qur’an’s decision to appeal to their readers.

Qur’an 10:94 Ibn Kathir · Qur’an 10:94 (Arabic) Qur’an 7:157

The collections also describe a physical Torah being consulted. In Bukhari 3635 and Muslim 1699a, the Torah is brought and read during a judgment concerning Jewish defendants. The reader covers the stoning passage with his hand; when told to lift it, he exposes the text. In this account, the charge is concealment of a ruling that remains in the book. Muhammad’s appeal is to an available text, not an inaccessible original.

Sahih al-Bukhari 3635 · the Torah consulted Sahih Muslim 1699a · the Torah consulted

02 The conflict

The surviving Gospel says Christ was crucified.

The New Testament does not leave the cross at the edge of its message. Paul proclaims Christ’s death for sins and resurrection; John presents the wounded, risen Jesus receiving Thomas’s confession as . Qur’an denies that Jesus’ opponents killed or crucified him, and forbids saying “Three” and denies that God has a son. These accounts cannot simply be merged into one message.

1 Corinthians 15:1–8 John 20:24–29 Qur’an 4:157 Qur’an 4:171

We are not guessing what a pre-Islamic New Testament contained. Codex Sinaiticus, dated to the fourth century, preserves the complete New Testament. It already contains this proclamation of Christ. Textual variants exist, but the dispute here is not over a spelling or an isolated copied word. It concerns the death, resurrection, and identity of Jesus at the heart of the books.

Codex Sinaiticus · dating Codex Sinaiticus · contents

Nor was the fourfold Gospel merely a Greek book far from Muhammad’s world. The Syriac Rabbula Gospels contain the four Gospels and a colophon dated February 586, locating their copying at a monastery in Syria. This is a further pre-Islamic witness to the Gospel books, in a major language of eastern Christianity.

Rabbula Gospels · Syriac manuscript, 586

03 The Muslim reply

An original , and the Qur’an as guardian?

The strongest Muslim reply distinguishes the revelation given to Jesus from the four canonical Gospels. It also points to : the Qur’an confirms earlier scripture and is over it, commonly understood as guardian, overseer, or authoritative criterion. On this account, Christians must follow what God truly revealed, while the Qur’an identifies and corrects their alterations. The phrase in , “what God revealed in it,” matters to that reply. Ibn Kathir’s commentary gathers the senses of trustworthiness, witness, and authority over earlier books. This explanation requires evidence for the alleged alterations and must be tested against the rest of the Muslim textual tradition, including its appeals to the Torah and Gospel available to Muhammad’s hearers.

Qur’an 5:43 Qur’an 5:47 Qur’an 7:157 Qur’an 5:48 Ibn Kathir · Qur’an 5:48

Qur’an condemns people who write a book and claim divine authority for gain; describes a party twisting their tongues so hearers mistake their words for scripture. These passages can be cited for textual or interpretive distortion. They must be read together with the appeals to the Torah and Gospel, not ignored. Ibn Abbas is also reported in Bukhari 7363 as charging the People of the Book with changing God’s Book and writing it with their own hands. Those are his reported words, not a saying attributed here to Muhammad.

Qur’an 2:79 Qur’an 3:78 Sahih al-Bukhari 7363 · Ibn Abbas on alteration

Some Muslim interpreters also understand as explaining the Gospel’s purpose in Jesus’ time, rather than issuing a new command to Christians in Muhammad’s time. Ibn Kathir’s commentary includes a reading with that historical reference. Even on this understanding, still speaks of the Torah with them, addresses the People of the Book through Muhammad, and locates the description in books with them. The availability argument does not depend on one verse alone.

Qur’an 5:43 Qur’an 5:68 Qur’an 7:157 Ibn Kathir · Qur’an 5:47

04 The answer

A possible lost book is not historical evidence.

The Qur’an does not reserve the language of a criterion for itself. In , Moses receives “the Scripture and the criterion”; Ibn Kathir identifies the Scripture as the Torah and explains as distinguishing truth from falsehood. In , Moses and Aaron receive al-, light and a reminder. Ibn Kathir records its identification with the Torah; al-Tabari instead understands it here as God’s judgment in their favor against Pharaoh. In , the Qur’an itself is called al-. and are different words, but the earlier witness cannot be dismissed merely by calling the later revelation a criterion too. A claim that the Torah’s words were altered still needs evidence.

Qur’an 2:53 Ibn Kathir · Qur’an 2:53 (Arabic) Qur’an 21:48 Ibn Kathir · Qur’an 21:48 (Arabic) Al-Tabari · Qur’an 21:48 (Arabic) Qur’an 25:1

Calling the Qur’an guardian does not, by itself, identify which Gospel text was available, what was altered, when it was altered, or why the surrounding passage still directs Christians to judge by it. A Muslim may consistently accept the Qur’an as the final criterion within Islamic belief. But when the truth of that belief is the issue, assuming that criterion cannot independently prove that the earlier evidence is false. The word states an authority claim; it does not supply the missing history.

Qur’an 5:47 Qur’an 5:48

Likewise, accusations against particular writers or reciters do not establish that every community’s Gospel was replaced, or that the crucifixion was inserted into all the witnesses before Islam. Such a replacement needs evidence connecting the accusation to the actual passages in dispute. The existence of forgery does not make every document a forgery. Ibn Abbas’s accusation states an early Muslim position, but it does not itself supply a pre-Islamic manuscript in which the Gospel’s cross and resurrection are absent. That is the historical evidence still required.

Codex Sinaiticus · dating Qur’an 2:79 Qur’an 3:78 Sahih al-Bukhari 7363 · Ibn Abbas on alteration

The claim that God’s words cannot be changed sharpens the question. Qur’an follows a passage about the revealed Book; joins the same assurance to a command to recite revelation. A Muslim may understand these words as God’s inviolable truth or decrees rather than a promise that every human copy is flawless. Even so, that distinction does not identify a different Gospel or explain how God’s usable guidance became an unrecoverable book.

Qur’an 6:114–115 Qur’an 18:27

There are proposed alternatives to examine. The Gospel of Barnabas survives in an Italian manuscript dated to the sixteenth century. A late copy can preserve an older work, but this manuscript supplies no seventh-century witness that it was the Gospel Muhammad’s Christian neighbors possessed. Irenaeus also reports a much earlier substitution story attributed to Basilides: Simon of Cyrene was crucified in Jesus’ place. Yet its Christ is an incorporeal divine power, not Islam’s human prophet. An early disagreement with the church is not automatically evidence for the Islamic .

Gospel of Barnabas · Italian manuscript record Irenaeus · Against Heresies 1.24.3–4

The decisive demand remains evidence. A different Gospel given to Jesus, carrying the Islamic account and shown to be the book these commands addressed, cannot be established merely by saying that it must once have existed for the Qur’an to be true. Used that way, the reasoning runs in a circle: the earlier testimony is rejected because the later claim is assumed, then the rejection is used to defend the same claim. The surviving Gospel is evidence in hand. A necessary assumption for a competing belief is not its equal.

Codex Sinaiticus · contents

05 Follow the evidence

Read the Gospel that actually remains.

Christians receive the New Testament alongside the Old, retaining the earlier Scriptures and proclaiming their fulfillment in Christ. The earlier witness remains available to be read and examined.

Matthew 5:17–18 · fulfillment

The dilemma therefore remains: why should a reader discard the central testimony of the accessible, pre-Islamic Gospel in favor of an imagined reconstruction whose content is inferred from its agreement with the Qur’an? The proper answer is not an accusation against a Muslim neighbor’s sincerity. It is to open the surviving Gospel and examine its witness to Jesus Christ, who died for sinners and rose again. His message is there to be read.

1 Corinthians 15:1–8 John 20:24–29

06READ FOR YOURSELF

Go to the sources.

Complete source list(35)

THE CONVERSATION CONTINUES

Another question awaits.

All reading paths